Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 92
Filter
1.
J Infect Public Health ; 16(8): 1244-1248, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20230715

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Thoracal lymphadenopathy may predict prognosis in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), albeit the reported data is inconclusive. The aim of the present analysis was to analyze the affected lymph node stations and the cumulative lymph node size derived from computed tomography (CT) for prediction of 30-day mortality in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: The clinical database was retrospectively screened for patients with COVID-19 between 2020 and 2022. Overall, 177 patients (63 female, 35.6%) were included into the analysis. Thoracal lymphadenopathy was defined by short axis diameter above 10 mm. Cumulative lymph node size of the largest lymph nodes was calculated and the amount of affected lymph node stations was quantified. RESULTS: Overall, 53 patients (29.9%) died within the 30-day observation period. 108 patients (61.0%) were admitted to the ICU and 91 patients needed to be intubated (51.4%). Overall, there were 130 patients with lymphadenopathy (73.4%). The mean number of affected lymph node levels were higher in non-survivors compared to survivors (mean, 4.0 vs 2.2, p < 0.001). The cumulative size was also higher in non-survivors compared to survivors (mean 55.9 mm versus 44.1 mm, p = 0.006). Presence of lymphadenopathy was associated with 30-day mortality in a multivariable analysis, OR = 2.99 (95% CI 1.20 - 7.43), p = 0.02. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracal lymphadenopathy comprising cumulative size and affected levels derived from CT images is associated with 30-day mortality in patients with COVID-19. COVID-19 patients presenting with thoracic lymphadenopathy should be considered as a risk group.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lymphadenopathy , Humans , Female , Retrospective Studies , Clinical Relevance , COVID-19/pathology , Lymphadenopathy/diagnostic imaging , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Lymph Nodes/pathology
3.
Clin Nucl Med ; 48(3): e149-e150, 2023 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2222957

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: We describe a case of a 56-year-old woman with primary hyperparathyroidism. 18F-Choline PET/MRI revealed incidental bilateral axillary lymphadenopathy with mild-moderate increased 18F-choline uptake. The patient had her first and third doses of COVID-19 vaccines from the left arm and second dose of vaccine from the right arm before PET examination.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hyperparathyroidism , Lymphadenopathy , Vaccines , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , COVID-19 Vaccines , Radiopharmaceuticals , Positron-Emission Tomography , Choline , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Lymphadenopathy/diagnostic imaging , Lymphadenopathy/etiology , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
4.
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc ; 83(4): 397-408, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2215202

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cervical lymphadenopathy can be benign or malignant. Its accurate diagnosis is necessary to determine appropriate treatment. Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsies (US-CNBs) are frequently used as a percutaneous sampling approach. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to identify the efficacy and safety of US-CNBs in 125 patients with cervical lymphadenopathy and clinically suspected head and neck cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic with limited surgical resources. METHODS: US-CNBs of pathological lymph nodes were performed in 146 lymph nodes on 125 patients. Biopsies were performed ultrasound-guided with a reusable gun core biopsy system and a 10-cm-long 16-G needle. Standard of reference for the histological findings were panendoscopy, clinical and sonographic follow-up, surgical biopsy or a repeat US-CNB. RESULTS: Adequate material for histologic diagnosis was obtained in 111 patients (89%), of these 83 patients (75%) were diagnosed as malignant, whereas benign lymphadenopathy accounted for 28 patients (25%). Therefore, US-CNB was able to identify malignant or benign lymphadenopathy with an overall accuracy of 88% and 90%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous US-CNB is a safe and effective alternative to surgical biopsy in the management of cervical lymphadenopathy in patients with clinically suspected head and neck cancer in a setting with limited resources.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Lymphadenopathy , Humans , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle , Pandemics , Lymphadenopathy/diagnostic imaging , Image-Guided Biopsy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Retrospective Studies
5.
Jpn J Radiol ; 41(6): 617-624, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2174888

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Unilateral axillary lymphadenopathy is known to occur after coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccination. Post-vaccination lymphadenopathy may mimic the metastatic lymph nodes in breast cancer, and it is challenging to distinguish between them. This study investigated whether the localization of axillary lymphadenopathy on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could be used to distinguish reactive lymphadenopathy after COVID-19 vaccines from metastatic nodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined preoperative MRI images of 684 axillae in 342 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery from June to October 2021. Lymphadenopathy was defined as cortical thickening or short axis ≥ 5 mm. The axilla was divided into ventral and dorsal parts on the axial plane using a perpendicular line extending from the most anterior margin of the muscle group, including the deltoid, latissimus dorsi, or teres major muscles, relative to a line along the lateral chest wall. We recorded the presence or absence of axillary lymphadenopathy in each area and the number of visible lymph nodes. RESULTS: Of 80 axillae, 41 and 39 were included in the vaccine and metastasis groups, respectively. The median time from the last vaccination to MRI was 19 days in the vaccine group. The number of visible axillary lymph nodes was significantly higher in the vaccine group (median, 15 nodes) than in the metastasis group (7 nodes) (P < 0.001). Dorsal lymphadenopathy was observed in 16 (39.0%) and two (5.1%) axillae in the vaccine and metastasis groups, respectively (P < 0.001). If the presence of both ventral and dorsal lymphadenopathy is considered indicative of vaccine-induced reaction, this finding has a sensitivity of 34.1%, specificity of 97.4%, and positive and negative predictive values of 93.3% and 58.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The presence of deep axillary lymphadenopathy may be an important factor for distinguishing post-vaccination lymphadenopathy from metastasis. The number of axillary lymph nodes may also help.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , COVID-19 , Lymphadenopathy , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Lymphatic Metastasis , COVID-19/pathology , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymphadenopathy/diagnostic imaging , Lymphadenopathy/etiology , Vaccination , Axilla/pathology
6.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 37(5): 907-913, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2192746

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Worldwide mass vaccination for COVID-19 started in late 2020. COVID-19 vaccines cause benign hypermetabolic lymphadenopathies. Clinical stratification between vaccine-associated benign lymphadenopathies and malignant lymphadenopathies through ultrasound, MRI or FDG PET-CT is not feasible. This leads to unnecessary lymph node biopsies, excisions and even radical lymph node dissections. Therefore, to avoid unnecessary surgeries, we assessed whether noninvasive multispectral optoacoustic tomography (MSOT) enables a better differentiation between benign and malignant lymphadenopathies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients were vaccinated for COVID-19. We used MSOT to image deoxy- and oxyhaemoglobin levels in lymph nodes of tumour patients to assess metastatic status. MSOT imaging results were compared with standard ultrasound and pathological lymph node analysis. We also evaluated the influences of gender, age and time between vaccination and MSOT measurement of lymph nodes on the measured deoxy- and oxyhaemoglobin levels in patients with reactive lymph node changes. RESULTS: Multispectral optoacoustic tomography was able to identify cancer-free lymph nodes in vivo without a single false negative (33 total lymph nodes), with 100% sensitivity and 50% specificity. A statistically significant higher deoxyhaemoglobin content was detected in patients with tumour manifestations in the lymph node (p = 0.02). There was no statistically significant difference concerning oxyhaemoglobin (p = 0.65). Age, sex and time between vaccination and MSOT measurement had statistically non-significant impact on deoxy- and oxyhaemoglobin levels in patients with reactive lymph nodes. CONCLUSION: Here, we show that MSOT measurement is an advantageous clinical approach to differentiate between vaccine-associated benign lymphadenopathy and malignant lymph node metastases based on the deoxygenation level in lymph nodes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coronavirus , Lymphadenopathy , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography/methods , COVID-19 Vaccines , Oxyhemoglobins , COVID-19/pathology , Lymphadenopathy/diagnostic imaging , Lymphadenopathy/etiology , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Vaccination , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
7.
J Comput Assist Tomogr ; 47(1): 50-57, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2191204

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of axillary and subpectoral (SP) lymph nodes after ipsilateral COVID-19 vaccine administration on chest computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Subjects with chest CTs between 2 and 25 days after a first or second vaccine dose, December 15, 2020, to February 12, 2021, were included. Orthogonal measures of the largest axillary and SP nodes were recorded by 2 readers blinded to vaccine administration and clinical details. A mean nodal diameter discrepancy of ≥6 mm between contralateral stations was considered positive for asymmetry. Correlation with the side of vaccination, using a Spearman rank correlation, was performed on the full cohort and after excluding patients with diseases associated with adenopathy. RESULTS: Of the 138 subjects (81 women, 57 men; mean [SD] age, 74.4 ± 11.7 years), 48 (35%) had asymmetrically enlarged axillary and/or SP lymph nodes, 42 (30%) had ipsilateral, and 6 (4%) had contralateral to vaccination ( P = 0.003). Exclusion of 29 subjects with conditions associated with adenopathy showed almost identical correlation, with asymmetric nodes in 32 of 109 (29%) ipsilateral and in 5 of 109 (5%) contralateral to vaccination ( P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Axillary and/or SP lymph nodes ipsilateral to vaccine administration represents a clinical conundrum. Asymmetric nodes were detected at CT in 30% of subjects overall and 29% of subjects without conditions associated with adenopathy, approximately double the prevalence rate reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention by vaccine manufacturers. When interpreting examinations correlation with vaccine administration timing and site is important for pragmatic management.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lymphadenopathy , Male , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Vaccines , Prevalence , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/pathology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Lymphadenopathy/diagnostic imaging , Lymphadenopathy/epidemiology , Lymphadenopathy/pathology , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Vaccination
9.
Acta Med Okayama ; 76(5): 593-596, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2117475

ABSTRACT

We encountered a woman with re-enlarged axillary lymph nodes during a computed tomography (CT) scan for surveillance of lung adenocarcinoma with axillary lymph node metastasis at the initial diagnosis that had shrunk with standard chemotherapy. We first suspected cancer recurrence and considered a change in the chemotherapeutic regimen. However, after careful history taking regarding the timing of her Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination, and subsequent careful, close follow-up, radiological shrinkage suggested a strictly benign cause. Especially in lung cancer with a medical history of axillary lymph node involvement, cliniciansshould be aware that vaccine-associated lymphadenopathy can mimic cancer recurrence and sometimesprompt serious misjudgment regarding a current treatment course and strategy.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma of Lung , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Lung Neoplasms , Lymphadenopathy , Female , Humans , Adenocarcinoma of Lung/pathology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymphadenopathy/diagnostic imaging , Lymphadenopathy/etiology , Lymphadenopathy/pathology , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
10.
Eur J Radiol ; 152: 110334, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2076083

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node characteristics on axillary ultrasound (US), breast MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT are relevant at breast cancer diagnosis. Axillary lymphadenopathy after COVID-19 vaccination has been frequently reported. This may cause a diagnostic dilemma, particularly in the ipsilateral axilla in women who have a either a recent diagnosis of breast cancer or a history of breast cancer. This review provides an overview of the current evidence regarding axillary lymph node characteristics at breast cancer diagnosis versus "post-COVID-19 vaccination". METHODS: A non-systematic narrative review was performed. Studies describing axillary lymph node characteristics per imaging modality (axillary US, breast MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT) in breast cancer patients versus post-COVID-19 vaccination were selected and used for the current study. RESULTS: The morphologic characteristics and distribution of abnormal nodes on US may differ from the appearance of metastatic adenopathy since diffuse cortical thickening of the lymph nodes is the most observed characteristic after vaccination, whereas metastases show as most suspicious characteristics focal cortical thickening and effacement of the fatty hilum. Current evidence on MRI and 18F-FDG on morphologic characteristics of axillary lymphadenopathy is missing, although it was suggested that vaccine related lymphadenopathy is more likely to be present in level 2 and 3 nodes than metastatic nodes. Reported frequencies of lymphadenopathy post-COVID-19 vaccination range from 49% to 85% (US), 29% (breast MRI) and 14.5% to 53.9% (18F-FDG PET/CT). Several factors may impact the presence or extent of lymphadenopathy post-COVID-19 vaccination: injection site, type of vaccine (i.e., mRNA versus vector), time interval (days) between vaccination and imaging, previous history of COVID-19 pneumonia, and first versus second vaccine dose. CONCLUSION: Although lymph node characteristics differ at breast cancer diagnosis versus post-COVID-19 vaccination, clinical information regarding injection site, vaccine type and vaccination date needs to be documented to improve the interpretation and guide treatment towards the next steps of action.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , COVID-19 , Lymphadenopathy , Axilla/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Female , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Humans , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymphadenopathy/diagnostic imaging , Lymphadenopathy/etiology , Lymphadenopathy/pathology , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Vaccination
11.
Clin Imaging ; 93: 1-3, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2061007

ABSTRACT

This retrospective study presents 110 patients with suspected COVID-19 vaccine-related axillary adenopathy on breast MRI. Our study aimed to assess the outcomes of axillary adenopathy detected on breast MRI performed within one year after COVID-19 vaccination. The median time between the COVID-19 vaccine and breast MRI was shorter in patients with detected adenopathy compared to patients without detected adenopathy (6 weeks [2-17] versus 15 [7-24] weeks, p < 0.001). Unilateral axillary adenopathy detected on breast MRI had a low malignancy rate (3.3%), and no cases of malignant axillary adenopathy were diagnosed without a known breast cancer in the ipsilateral breast. Our findings suggest that unilateral axillary adenopathy identified on breast MRI ipsilateral to a recent COVID-19 vaccination can be considered benign in the absence of a suspicious breast finding or known breast cancer. Regardless of vaccine status and timing, unilateral axillary adenopathy detected on MRI evaluation with a known malignancy or suspicious breast finding should be considered suspicious. This will avoid unnecessary scheduling constraints, patient anxiety, and cost, without delaying diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Lymphadenopathy , Female , Humans , Axilla/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Follow-Up Studies , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymphadenopathy/diagnostic imaging , Lymphadenopathy/etiology , Lymphadenopathy/pathology , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Retrospective Studies , Vaccination
13.
Eur Radiol ; 32(9): 5921-5929, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1990616

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if radiomics with machine learning can differentiate between F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid breast cancer metastatic lymphadenopathy and FDG-avid COVID-19 mRNA vaccine-related axillary lymphadenopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed FDG-positive, pathology-proven, metastatic axillary lymph nodes in 53 breast cancer patients who had PET/CT for follow-up or staging, and FDG-positive axillary lymph nodes in 46 patients who were vaccinated with the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. Radiomics features (110 features classified into 7 groups) were extracted from all segmented lymph nodes. Analysis was performed on PET, CT, and combined PET/CT inputs. Lymph nodes were randomly assigned to a training (n = 132) and validation cohort (n = 33) by 5-fold cross-validation. K-nearest neighbors (KNN) and random forest (RF) machine learning models were used. Performance was evaluated using an area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) score. RESULTS: Axillary lymph nodes from breast cancer patients (n = 85) and COVID-19-vaccinated individuals (n = 80) were analyzed. Analysis of first-order features showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in all combined PET/CT features, most PET features, and half of the CT features. The KNN model showed the best performance score for combined PET/CT and PET input with 0.98 (± 0.03) and 0.88 (± 0.07) validation AUC, and 96% (± 4%) and 85% (± 9%) validation accuracy, respectively. The RF model showed the best result for CT input with 0.96 (± 0.04) validation AUC and 90% (± 6%) validation accuracy. CONCLUSION: Radiomics features can differentiate between FDG-avid breast cancer metastatic and FDG-avid COVID-19 vaccine-related axillary lymphadenopathy. Such a model may have a role in differentiating benign nodes from malignant ones. KEY POINTS: • Patients who were vaccinated with the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine have shown FDG-avid reactive axillary lymph nodes in PET-CT scans. • We evaluated if radiomics and machine learning can distinguish between FDG-avid metastatic axillary lymphadenopathy in breast cancer patients and FDG-avid reactive axillary lymph nodes. • Combined PET and CT radiomics data showed good test AUC (0.98) for distinguishing between metastatic axillary lymphadenopathy and post-COVID-19 vaccine-associated axillary lymphadenopathy. Therefore, the use of radiomics may have a role in differentiating between benign from malignant FDG-avid nodes.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , COVID-19 , Lymphadenopathy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Female , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Humans , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymphadenopathy/diagnostic imaging , Lymphadenopathy/etiology , Lymphadenopathy/pathology , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Pilot Projects , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Retrospective Studies , Vaccination , Vaccines, Synthetic , mRNA Vaccines
14.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 219(4): 559-568, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1963272

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND. The variable clinical course of subclinical lymphadenopathy detected on breast imaging after COVID-19 vaccination creates management challenges and has led to evolving practice recommendations. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the duration of axillary lymphadenopathy ipsilateral to COVID-19 vaccination detected by breast imaging and to assess factors associated with the time until resolution. METHODS. This retrospective single-center study included 111 patients (mean age, 52 ± 12 years) with unilateral axillary lymphadenopathy ipsilateral to mRNA COVID-19 vaccine administration performed within the prior 8 weeks that was detected on breast ultrasound performed between January 1, 2021, and October 1, 2021, and who underwent follow-up ultrasound examinations at 4- to 12-week intervals until resolution of the lymphadenopathy. Patient information was extracted from medical records. Cortical thickness of the largest axillary lymph node on ultrasound was retrospectively measured and was considered enlarged when greater than 3 mm. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of time until resolution. RESULTS. The mean cortical thickness at the initial ultrasound examination was 4.7 ± 1.2 mm. The lymphadenopathy resolved a mean of 97 ± 44 days after the initial ultrasound examination, 127 ± 43 days after the first vaccine dose, and 2.4 ± 0.6 follow-up ultrasound examinations. A significant independent predictor of shorter time to resolution was Pfizer-BioNTech (rather than Moderna) vaccination (ß = -18.0 [95% CI, -34.3 to -1.7]; p = .03]. Significant independent predictors of longer time to resolution were receipt of the second dose after the initial ultrasound examination (ß = 19.2 [95% CI, 3.1-35.2]; p = .02) and greater cortical thickness at the initial ultrasound examination (ß = 8.0 [95% CI, 1.5-14.5]; p = .02). Patient age, history of breast cancer, and axillary symptoms were not significantly associated with time to resolution (all p > .05). CONCLUSION. Axillary lymphadenopathy detected with breast ultrasound after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination lasts longer than reported in initial vaccine clinical trials. CLINICAL IMPACT. The prolonged time to resolution supports not delaying screening mammography because of recent COVID-19 vaccination. It also supports the professional society recommendation of a follow-up interval of at least 12 weeks when vaccine-related lymphadenopathy is suspected.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Lymphadenopathy , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Humans , Lymphadenopathy/diagnostic imaging , Lymphadenopathy/etiology , Lymphatic Metastasis , Mammography , Middle Aged , RNA, Messenger/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies
15.
J Ultrasound ; 25(4): 965-971, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1943561

ABSTRACT

AIMS: lymphadenopathy can occur after COVID-19 vaccination and when encountered at ultrasound examinations performed for other reasons might pose a diagnostic challenge. Purpose of the study was to evaluate the incidence, course and ultrasound imaging features of vaccine-induced lymphadenopathy. METHODS: 89 healthy volunteers (median age 30, 76 females) were prospectively enrolled. Vaccine-related clinical side effects (e.g., fever, fatigue, palpable or painful lymphadenopathy) were recorded. Participants underwent bilateral axillary, supraclavicular and cervical lymph node stations ultrasound 1-4 weeks after the second dose and then again after 4-12 weeks in those who showed lymphadenopathy at the first ultrasound. B-mode, color-Doppler assessment, and shear-wave elastography (SWE) evaluation were performed. The correlation between lymphadenopathy and vaccine-related side effects was assessed using the Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Post-vaccine lymphadenopathy were found in 69/89 (78%) participants (37 single and 32 multiple lymphadenopathy). Among them, 60 presented vaccine-related side effects, but no statistically significant difference was observed between post-vaccine side effect and lymphadenopathy. Ultrasound features of vaccine-related lymphadenopathy consisted of absence of fatty hilum, round shape and diffuse or asymmetric cortical thickness (median cortical thickness of 5 mm). Vascular signal was mainly found to be increased, localized in both central and peripheral regions. SWE showed a soft cortical consistence in all cases (median value 11 Kpa). At follow-up, lymph-node morphology was completely restored in most cases (54/69, 78%) and in no case lymphadenopathy had worsened. CONCLUSION: A high incidence of vaccine-induced lymphadenopathy was found in a population of healthy subjects, with nearly complete regression within 4-12 weeks.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Lymphadenopathy , Female , Humans , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Incidence , Lymphadenopathy/chemically induced , Lymphadenopathy/diagnostic imaging , Lymphadenopathy/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Ultrasonography
19.
J Korean Med Sci ; 37(22): e78, 2022 Jun 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1879449

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We analyzed the differences between clinical characteristics and computed tomography (CT) findings in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to establish potential relationships with mediastinal lymphadenopathy and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We compared the clinical characteristics and CT findings of COVID-19 patients from a nationwide multicenter cohort who were grouped based on the presence or absence of mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Differences between clinical characteristics and CT findings in these groups were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the impact of mediastinal lymphadenopathy on clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 344 patients included in this study, 53 (15.4%) presented with mediastinal lymphadenopathy. The rate of diffuse alveolar damage pattern pneumonia and the visual CT scores were significantly higher in patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathy than in those without (P < 0.05). A positive correlation between the number of enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes and visual CT scores was noted in patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathy (Spearman's ρ = 0.334, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that mediastinal lymphadenopathy was independently associated with a higher risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admission (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval; 3.25, 1.06-9.95) but was not significantly associated with an increased risk of in-hospital death in patients with COVID-19. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathy had a larger extent of pneumonia than those without. Multivariate analysis adjusted for clinical characteristics and CT findings revealed that the presence of mediastinal lymphadenopathy was significantly associated with ICU admission.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lymphadenopathy , COVID-19/complications , Cohort Studies , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Lymphadenopathy/diagnostic imaging , Lymphadenopathy/pathology , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL